Data Analysis
 
Data and Results For Water Quality along the Stony Brook River
Blue = data from 6/14/97 , Green = data from 7/9/97 , Red = data from 7/15/97 
NA =  Not Available
Site
Temperature
o C
Time
EST
Dissolved Oxygen
ppm
Nitrate
mg / l
Phosphate
ppm
Fecal Coliform
# of colonies per 100 ml
pH
Stony Brook 5
22.5
26
10:45a.m
8:15 a.m
8.4
6.0
.5
1.1
1.0
1.0
66
396
7.3
7.5
Stony Brook 4
26.5
26
12:10p.m 
9:15 a.m.
8.0
5.4
5
4.4
5.0
5.0
99
495
8.0
7.9
Honey Creek 1
22
24
25
NA
1:10 p.m. 
9:40 a.m.
7.1
6.0
5.2
.3
.5
.4
.2
1.0
1.0
NA
0
198
7.5
7.8
8.0
Stony Brook 2
29
24
2:10 p.m.
8:30 a.m.
8.0
5.0
.5
.1
1.0
0
0
33
9.2
7.8
Stony Brook 1
28
24.5
3:05 p.m.
9:30 a.m.
9.6
5.0
0
0
1.0
0
0
198
9.3
7.5
Stony Brook .75
23.0
26.5
25.5
NA
3:55 p.m.
10:00 a.m.
2.3
5.2
3.0
.8
0
0
.2
1.0
1.0
NA
0
0
7.0
7.4
7.3
 
 
Data and Results for Soil Quality along the Stony Brook River 
Green = data from 7/9/97 , Red = data from 7/15/97 
NA = Not Available
Site
pH
Phosphates
Nitrates
Potassium
Stony Brook 5
6.0
6.0
Trace
None
None
None
Medium
Medium
Stony Brook 4
5.0
6.0
None
Low
None
Trace
Medium
Medium
Honey Creek 1
8.0 +
8.0 +
Trace
Medium
Trace -
None
Medium-Low
Medium
Stony Brook 2
NA
6.0
NA
Trace
NA
Trace +
NA
Medium - Low
Stony Brook 1
NA
6.0
NA
Trace
NA
Trace +
NA
Medium -Low
Stony Brook .75
5.0
7.0
Low
Low
Trace +
Trace -
Medium
Medium
 
 
 Site Descriptions:

Stony Brook 5 (SB5)

Stony Brook 4 (SB4)

Honey Creek 1 (HO1)

Stony Brook 2 (SB2)

Stony Brook 1 (SB1)

Stony Brook (SB.75)

 
 
Drawing A Conclusion:
 

        Having examined the data from the water quality tests, it is the research team's conclusion that runoff from the agricultural land in the upper regions of the Stony Brook river are an important factor in the change of water quality along the  river.  Following a rainfall, after a two month period of dry weather, it was noted that at sites SB5, and SB4 showed an increase in two constituents, namely nitrates and fecal coliform. Both of these sites are adjacent to wooded areas and land used for agricultural purposes.
 
        An additional indication of poor water quality was the dramatic decrease in the amount of dissolved oxygen available for aquatic life all along the river. There are strong indications that something is removing large amounts of  dissolved oxygen. The increase numbers in fecal coliform combined with the low dissolved oxygen levels suggest an increase in the amount of bacteria growing in the water. Such a suggestion was confirmed by the research team on their second visit to SB4, where they observed a moderate algal bloom in its infant stages.

        Downstream from SB4 nitrate levels fell considerably, while fecal coliform counts remained high. Immediately downstream from the SB4 test site is small marshy area. It is the the research team's conclusion that the increase levels in nitrates at SB4 where due to fertilizer application on the agricultural land around that spot. The excess nitrates where then filtered out by the marshland, hence the drop in nitrate levels at the subsequent test sites. The increase in fecal coliform could be linked to the suburban area adjacent to SB4. While not conclusive the research team suspects that his suburban area may either have faulty septic systems or faulty sewer links.

        Located between SB1 and SB.75, is the Elizabeth Town water treatment plant. Fecal coliform data ( 198 to 0 ) indicates that the treatment plant is adequately removing fecal coliform colonies from the water before it enters Carnegie Lake. In contrast however, dissolved oxygen data still suggests that an ecological event is occurring. It is important to note that on both testing dates the research team observed an oily scum of bacteria growing on the surface of the water at site SB.75.
 

        Due to the lack of quantatative data  concerning the soil testing sites, the research team has agreed that no conclusions can be made. Observations indicate that in comparison to the water  at the same test sites the soils are slightly more acidic than the water.

        Please keep in mind that limited time and resources a full scale research endeavor was not possible. Without more comprehensive data for both the soil and the water test sites, strong conclusions can not be made. What you have instead is a direction toward which your data is leading you. We would recomend that if testing soil and water, weekly tests should be done and comperhensive data collected before drawing any conclusions about the overall quality of water and the soils.